Debates

Since 2019 we have created detailed summaries of our debates. Reading those provides the best way to understand how Sylvan debates work and tap into the wisdom we generate.

See recent debates below, or search for any topic of interest here:

Recent debates

In the religion and safety debate, the Sylvans weighed whether on balance the world would be a safer place without religion, and disagreed.

Religion and safety: a debate on faith

People pray in over 7,000 languages worldwide. Billions look to a higher power for guidance. But does this devotion breed peace or conflict? We recently explored a highly contentious motion regarding …

In the Iran regime change debate, the Sylvans weighed both sides and agreed they welcome attempts for regime change in Iran.

Iran regime change: morals, history and strategy

On 16 March 2026, the Sylvans gathered to tackle a highly contentious geopolitical issue: Iran regime change. The room buzzed with anticipation as the speakers prepared to debate a provocative motion,…

In the US-Europe alliance debate, the Sylvans narrowly rejected the view that the US is no longer a European ally.

US-Europe alliance: is the bond broken?

Welcome to another engaging evening with the Sylvans, where members gathered to debate a highly controversial motion. They fiercely discussed the following statement: ‘The US is no longer a European a…

In the AI inequality debate, the Sylvans agreed that AI will drive inequality faster than it increases productivity.

AI inequality: the productivity debate

The Sylvans recently hosted a fascinating short debate evening on AI inequality. The audience voted to tackle a highly relevant and divisive topic. They chose to debate whether AI will widen inequalit…

In the university education debate, the Sylvans considered whether university education is still worth the money, and narrowly agreed.

University education: is it worth the cost?

The value of university education is a topic that divides opinion across generations and industries. The Sylvans gathered to debate a motion that cuts to the heart of modern aspiration: ‘university …

In the Robin Hood debate, the Sylvans considered whether to bring back the rob-from-the-rich outlaw, and agreed!

Robin Hood debate: wealth, justice and tights

On December 1, 2025, the Sylvans gathered to debate a motion that echoes through centuries of folklore and economic theory: ‘this house would bring back Robin Hood.’ The debate explored whether Rob…

In the toxic masculinity debate, the Sylvans considered a wide range of arguments and disagreed that masculinity is inherently toxic.

Toxic masculinity: is masculinity inherently toxic?

The motion facing the Sylvans was clear and charged: ‘masculinity is not inherently toxic.’ From the first speech, the debate centred on what people mean by masculinity, what toxic masculinity actuall…

Earlier debates

For debate summaries from more than a year ago, please go to past debate topics. You can see results of debates since 2015, our motions since 1999 and a selection of debate topics running back to 1968 (our centenary). We also have more information about the history of the Sylvans.